Sarah Palin lied while fighting polar bear protection

Not being familiar with the US political landscape, I had never heard of  Sarah Palin before; now I have: twice. Recently as a result of her nomination to McCain’s running mate, and today after reading that as Governor of Alaska she is opposing the protection of polar bears because she wants instead protect the interests of industries such as oil and fisheries.This report was published by (American) ABC News.

McCain’s vice-presidential pick, Alaskan Gov. Sarah Palin, sued the Bush Administration in federal court recently, charging it was too accepting of climate change studies which overstated the phenomenon’s impact on polar bears. The result, she argued, would be a negative impact on her state’s businesses, including oil and gas extraction.

McCain’s vice-presidential pick sued the Bush Administration in federal court recently, charging it was too accepting of climate change studies which overstated the phenomenon’s impact on polar bears. The result, Sarah Palin argued, would be a negative impact on her state’s businesses, including oil and gas extraction. (ABC News Photo Illustration)

Even as the White House has finessed its position on polar bears in the face of legal challenges and public pressure, Palin has led her state’s efforts to block protections for the world’s estimated 25,000 polar bears, of which roughly a fifth are believed to reside in Alaska.

“Listing the polar bear as a threatened species [under the Endangered Species Act] will have a significant adverse impact on Alaska because. . . [it] will deter activities such as commercial fisheries, oil and gas exploration and development, transportation, and tourism,” Palin’s administration argued in its complaint against the Interior Department, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Aug. 4.

In defending her position, Palin has discounted the findings of nine recent U.S. Geological Survey studies which concluded that the polar bear’s habitat is threatened by global warming, and the animals could be extinct before this century ends.

Three of Palin’s own state scientists reviewed the USGS studies and found them sound, according to internal documents released to an Alaska professor earlier this year under the state’s open records law. But she has argued, in a New York Times editorial and elsewhere, that “there is insufficient evidence that polar bears are in danger of becoming extinct in the foreseeable future.”

Palin’s position, she wrote, is based on “a comprehensive review by state wildlife officials of scientific information from a broad range of climate, ice and polar bear experts.”

“Essentially, she lied,” said University of Alaska professor Rick Steiner, who wrangled with the Palin administration for months to obtain the documents. “She came out and said, ‘our scientists agree the polar bears are fine and should not be listed’” when that wasn’t the case, said Steiner, a conservation specialist who studies climate change. The McCain-Palin campaign did not make the governor available for comment.